Disability Benefits Appeal Following Work Accident Assessment Discrepancy
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA claimant, insured under mandatory accident insurance, appealed a decision regarding disability benefits following a work-related accident, where the prior instance had assessed the degree of disability differently, potentially resulting in a lower benefit amount. The court reviewed the appeal to determine whether the prior decision adequately considered all medical evidence and correctly assessed the claimant's remaining earning capacity following the accident, ultimately upholding or overturning the prior finding on the extent of the permanent disability for the purpose of calculating the due insurance benefits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertDisability Benefits Appeal Following Work Accident Assessment Discrepancy: The court reviewed the appeal to determine whether the prior decision adequately considered all medical evidence and correctly assessed the claimant's remaining earning capacity following the accident, ultimately upholding or overturning the prior finding on the extent of the permanent disability for the purpose of calculating the due insurance benefits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 67 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, 8853 Lachen, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: