Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2022 4 • VG SZ I 2022 4 KI-generiert

Survivor's Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Contribution Period

Geschäftsnummer I 2022 4
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought survivor's benefits from disability insurance following the death of their spouse, but the initial administrative review denied the claim, leading to an appeal. The court upheld the denial because the claimant failed to demonstrate that the deceased spouse had worked for the requisite minimum period under the relevant insurance scheme before the disability that ultimately led to their death, thereby not satisfying the necessary contribution requirements for awarding survivor's benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Survivor's Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Contribution Period: The court upheld the denial because the claimant failed to demonstrate that the deceased spouse had worked for the requisite minimum period under the relevant insurance scheme before the disability that ultimately led to their death, thereby not satisfying the necessary contribution requirements for awarding survivor's benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Hinterlassenenleistungen Beitragsforderung Invalidenversicherungsleistungen Tod des Ehegatten Mindestbeitragsdauer Sterbegeld Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert
II 2023 51
Social Security Survivor's Benefits Appeal
II 2021 21
Appeal of Unemployment Benefits Denial Based on Insufficient Contribution Period Despite Disability
II 2024 82
Survivor's Insurance Benefits Damages Claim Preclusion
I 2018 29
Claimant Denied Continued Disability Benefits
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 3. Juni 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: