Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2022 33 • VG SZ I 2022 33 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity

Geschäftsnummer I 2022 33
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought a disability pension from the disability insurance office, which the office rejected, leading to an appeal. The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity: The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenrente Resterwerbsfähigkeit Feststellung der Erwerbsfähigkeit Erwerbstätigkeit Rechtsfähigkeit Ermittlung des Invalideneinkommens
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenrente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: