Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2022 2 • VG SZ I 2022 2 KI-generiert

Social Insurance Disability Assessment Appeal Upheld

Geschäftsnummer I 2022 2
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant challenged a decision concerning social insurance benefits, specifically regarding the classification of a medical condition and resulting disability assessment. The court reasoned that the contested assessment, which determined the degree of occupational disability, was based on a proper, detailed medical evaluation considering all relevant objective medical facts and adhering to established legal standards for assessing impairment, thereby upholding the lower administrative body's findings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Social Insurance Disability Assessment Appeal Upheld: The court reasoned that the contested assessment, which determined the degree of occupational disability, was based on a proper, detailed medical evaluation considering all relevant objective medical facts and adhering to established legal standards for assessing impairment, thereby upholding the lower administrative body's findings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invaliditätsbemessung Versicherungsleistung der Sozialversicherung objektive medizinische Befunde Invalidenleistungen des Versicherten medizinische Gründe sozialversicherungsrechtliches Klageverfahren Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität) | Unfallversicherung
KI-generiert
I 2020 3
Claimant v. Social Insurance Authority (Disability Benefits Appeal)
I 2019 15
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Decision Upheld
I 2020 77
Disability Benefits Appeal Affirmed on Objective Medical Evaluation
I 2020 18
Appeal Regarding Disability Benefits and Medical Assessment Validity
I 2017 103
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 2 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, \n 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n