Claimant v. Insurance Authority re: Disability Benefits
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA claimant appealed a decision by the insurance authority regarding disability insurance benefits, challenging the assessment of their degree of disability. The court reasoned that although the claimant suffered from a condition, the evidence did not establish a reduction in earning capacity sufficient to warrant the requested level of benefits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 65 Abs. 2 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Insurance Authority re: Disability Benefits: The court reasoned that although the claimant suffered from a condition, the evidence did not establish a reduction in earning capacity sufficient to warrant the requested level of benefits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe appeal is declared inadmissible because the decision under review is not a final decision appealable under this provision.
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 71 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. April 2022 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: