Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2021 33 • VG SZ I 2021 33 KI-generiert

Disability Insurance Benefit Revision Denial Based on Insufficient Change in Facts

Geschäftsnummer I 2021 33
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An applicant sought the revision of a prior administrative court decision concerning disability insurance benefits, arguing that subsequent medical reports established a significant change in the legally relevant facts or that the previous decision was based on incorrect findings. The court reasoned that for a revision under the relevant social security legislation, the applicant must demonstrate either a substantive change in the legally significant factual situation or that the previous decision was demonstrably flawed due to an incorrect assessment of the evidence; however, the submitted new medical evidence did not meet the high threshold required to overturn a final, binding administrative decision on the basis of a significant and qualifying change in circumstances or a clear error in the original judicial determination.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Disability Insurance Benefit Revision Denial Based on Insufficient Change in Facts: The court reasoned that for a revision under the relevant social security legislation, the applicant must demonstrate either a substantive change in the legally significant factual situation or that the previous decision was demonstrably flawed due to an incorrect assessment of the evidence; however, the submitted new medical evidence did not meet the high threshold required to overturn a final, binding administrative decision on the basis of a significant and qualifying change in circumstances or a clear error in the original judicial determination.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenrentenrevision Invaliditätsbemessung unrichtige Sachverhaltsfeststellung Sozialversicherungsrecht Beweiswürdigung Versicherungsleistung der Sozialversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. Juni 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefanie Zlauwinen, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsteller, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Gesuchsgegnerin, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Gesuch um Revision des Verwaltungs­gerichtsentscheids VGE I 2015 81 vom 3.3.2016) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: