Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA complainant appealed a decision regarding accident insurance benefits, disputing the causal link between an accident and a listed diagnosis for which benefits were claimed. The court, in its decision, upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that although the accident occurred, the evidence did not establish the requisite medical causality between the initial incident and the subsequent listed diagnosis to mandate the insurer's liability for the claimed benefits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAccident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute: The court, in its decision, upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that although the accident occurred, the evidence did not establish the requisite medical causality between the initial incident and the subsequent listed diagnosis to mandate the insurer's liability for the claimed benefits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 3 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. April 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Leistungspflicht aus \n Listendiagnose