Appellant v. Accident Insurance Benefit Reduction for Extraordinary Risk
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn appellant challenged a reduction in daily sickness benefits, imposed due to exposure to an extraordinary risk under accident insurance, following an incident that occurred during a professional activity. The court reasoned that for an extraordinary risk to justify benefit reduction, the danger must be significantly greater than the normal risks inherent in the insured activity, and the insured must have intentionally or with gross negligence exposed themselves to this heightened danger, which was not sufficiently established in this case regarding the specific circumstances of the incident.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppellant v. Accident Insurance Benefit Reduction for Extraordinary Risk: The court reasoned that for an extraordinary risk to justify benefit reduction, the danger must be significantly greater than the normal risks inherent in the insured activity, and the insured must have intentionally or with gross negligence exposed themselves to this heightened danger, which was not sufficiently established in this case regarding the specific circumstances of the incident.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 98 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. April 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanya Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Unfallversicherung (Taggeldkürzung infolge aussergewöhnlicher Gefahr,