Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2020 88 • VG SZ I 2020 88 KI-generiert

Denial of Disability Benefits Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence of Long-Term Impairment

Geschäftsnummer I 2020 88
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant sought disability insurance benefits based on alleged health impairments, but the insurance office denied the claim, leading to an appeal. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish that the appellant suffered from a limitation of earning capacity lasting or expected to last for at least one year, which is a prerequisite for receiving disability benefits under the relevant statute, and thus the appeal had to be dismissed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Denial of Disability Benefits Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence of Long-Term Impairment: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish that the appellant suffered from a limitation of earning capacity lasting or expected to last for at least one year, which is a prerequisite for receiving disability benefits under the relevant statute, and thus the appeal had to be dismissed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenversicherungsleistungen Versicherungsleistungsbegehren medizinische Gründe Krankenversicherung Verjährungsfrist Verschlimmerung des Gesundheitsschadens Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG

The appeal is dismissed, and costs are imposed according to this article.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal fee is set according to this article.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 88 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. März 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: