Disability Benefits Review Based on Alcohol Abstinence
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant sought disability benefits, arguing their condition, related to alcohol dependence, had not improved, while the insurance authority scheduled a review of the prospective pension, conditioned on abstinence. The court found that the authority was entitled to review the pension based on the established medical facts that the appellant had not abstained from alcohol, and since continued non-abstinence was not a recognized medical cause preventing improvement, the condition for the review was met, thus upholding the decision to schedule the review.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Disability Benefits Review Based on Alcohol Abstinence: The court found that the authority was entitled to review the pension based on the established medical facts that the appellant had not abstained from alcohol, and since continued non-abstinence was not a recognized medical cause preventing improvement, the condition for the review was met, thus upholding the decision to schedule the review.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to prove that the challenged decision violated legal provisions (Art. 65 para. 1 lit. a ATSG is cited in the dispositive by implication as the general basis for review, though not explicitly listed as the ground for dismissal, but as the standard for appeal review, in this context it leads to the rejection of the appeal).
The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs because the appeal was unsuccessful.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 74 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Künftige Rentenrevision / Alkoholabstinenz) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: