Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2020 74 • VG SZ I 2020 74 KI-generiert

Disability Benefits Review Based on Alcohol Abstinence

Geschäftsnummer I 2020 74
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought disability benefits, arguing their condition, related to alcohol dependence, had not improved, while the insurance authority scheduled a review of the prospective pension, conditioned on abstinence. The court found that the authority was entitled to review the pension based on the established medical facts that the appellant had not abstained from alcohol, and since continued non-abstinence was not a recognized medical cause preventing improvement, the condition for the review was met, thus upholding the decision to schedule the review.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Disability Benefits Review Based on Alcohol Abstinence: The court found that the authority was entitled to review the pension based on the established medical facts that the appellant had not abstained from alcohol, and since continued non-abstinence was not a recognized medical cause preventing improvement, the condition for the review was met, thus upholding the decision to schedule the review.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision von Invalidenleistungen Alkoholabhängigkeit medizinische Überprüfung Versicherungsleistungen Invalidenrente Einstellung der Invalidenrenten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG

The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to prove that the challenged decision violated legal provisions (Art. 65 para. 1 lit. a ATSG is cited in the dispositive by implication as the general basis for review, though not explicitly listed as the ground for dismissal, but as the standard for appeal review, in this context it leads to the rejection of the appeal).

Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs because the appeal was unsuccessful.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 74 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Künftige Rentenrevision / Alkoholabstinenz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: