Jurisdiction in Supplementary Accident Insurance Dispute
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case concerns a dispute over benefits from supplementary accident insurance (UVG-Zusatzversicherung), where the claimant appealed a decision regarding jurisdiction. The court needed to determine the competent authority for adjudicating the claim based on the policy and relevant law. The court reasoned that jurisdiction for supplementary insurance claims, absent specific contractual deviations, follows the general rules governing the primary statutory accident insurance, thereby upholding the initial jurisdictional finding.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertJurisdiction in Supplementary Accident Insurance Dispute: The court needed to determine the competent authority for adjudicating the claim based on the policy and relevant law. The court reasoned that jurisdiction for supplementary insurance claims, absent specific contractual deviations, follows the general rules governing the primary statutory accident insurance, thereby upholding the initial jurisdictional finding.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 59 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 9. September 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n E.________ AG, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungen aus UVG-Zusatzversicherung; Zuständigkeit) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: