Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2020 3 • VG SZ I 2020 3 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Social Insurance Authority (Disability Benefits Appeal)

Geschäftsnummer I 2020 3
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant, appealing a decision from the social insurance authority, challenged the denial of disability insurance benefits, arguing that the authority had improperly assessed their capacity to work. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the administrative decision correctly relied on a thorough medical evaluation which demonstrated that the claimant retained sufficient residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market despite their reported limitations, thus not meeting the legal threshold for a full disability pension.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Claimant v. Social Insurance Authority (Disability Benefits Appeal): The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the administrative decision correctly relied on a thorough medical evaluation which demonstrated that the claimant retained sufficient residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market despite their reported limitations, thus not meeting the legal threshold for a full disability pension.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenleistung zumutbare Resterwerbsfähigkeit sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit Rechtsfähigkeit Sozialarbeit Anspruch auf Versicherungsleistungen Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert
I 2021 40
Social Insurance Disability Benefits Appeal Regarding Earning Capacity
I 2019 83
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2019 54
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Following Workplace Injury
I 2017 99
Social Insurance Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Earning Capacity
I 2022 14
Appeal of Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 3 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. März 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Prof.Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: