Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2020 23 • VG SZ I 2020 23 KI-generiert

Insured v. Insurance Company: Denial of Disability Benefits Appeal

Geschäftsnummer I 2020 23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An insured individual filed an appeal challenging a decision by an insurance company that denied continued disability benefits following a work accident, arguing that the prerequisite medical assessment confirming continued functional limitations was disregarded. The court upheld the appeal, reasoning that the initial assessment, conducted by the treating physician and detailing ongoing functional deficits from the accident, constituted sufficient medical evidence to establish a legally recognized reduction in earning capacity, which the insurance company had failed to adequately refute with contradictory expert findings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 BGG; Insured v. Insurance Company: Denial of Disability Benefits Appeal: The court upheld the appeal, reasoning that the initial assessment, conducted by the treating physician and detailing ongoing functional deficits from the accident, constituted sufficient medical evidence to establish a legally recognized reduction in earning capacity, which the insurance company had failed to adequately refute with contradictory expert findings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenleistungen des Versicherten Invaliditätsbemessung Leistungen der Unfallversicherung Leistungskürzung Versicherungsgesellschaft Arbeitsfähigkeit Unfallversicherung (Leistungen) | Unfallversicherung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive to regulate the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 23 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. September 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n E.________, Versicherungs-Gesellschaft AG, E.________, 1001 Lausanne, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: