Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2020 20 • VG SZ I 2020 20 KI-generiert

Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm

Geschäftsnummer I 2020 20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Two petitioners appealed a decision concerning accident insurance coverage for an injury deemed an accident-like bodily harm, where the core issue was whether the resulting condition qualified as an insurable accident under the relevant law. The court reasoned that for an event to constitute an accident-like bodily harm, it must involve an unforeseen, sudden, and externally induced physical impact on the body that causes harm, and since the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish a sudden, external event causing the specific impairment, the appeal against the prior decision denying coverage was ultimately dismissed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm: The court reasoned that for an event to constitute an accident-like bodily harm, it must involve an unforeseen, sudden, and externally induced physical impact on the body that causes harm, and since the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish a sudden, external event causing the specific impairment, the appeal against the prior decision denying coverage was ultimately dismissed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Unfallversicherungsdeckung Körperverletzung direktes Forderungsrecht gegen den Versicherer unrechtmässige Versicherungsleistung sturzbedingte Körperschädigung Haftung für Zufall
KI-generiert
I 2019 20
Accident Insurance Bodily Injury Appeal
I 2018 28
Appeal on Causality in Accident Insurance Coverage
I 2022 27
Insurance Coverage for Accident Claim Dispute
I 2019 11
Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim
I 2019 66
Accident Insurance Coverage Causation Dispute

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Juli 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführer, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (unfallähnliche Körperschädigung; 2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren I 2019 20) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: