Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2020 104 • VG SZ I 2020 104 KI-generiert

Disability Pension Discontinuation Appeal Upheld

Geschäftsnummer I 2020 104
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought to overturn a decision by the administrative body to discontinue their disability insurance pension, stemming from a previous finding that the appellant's degree of disability no longer met the legal threshold. The court reasoned that although the appellant reported ongoing symptoms and sought further treatment, the medical documentation did not conclusively establish that the work capacity limitation had worsened or that the previous assessment of residual capacity was erroneous, thus upholding the decision to cease the pension payments as the documented medical condition did not warrant a continued entitlement based on the existing evidence.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG, Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 67 Abs. 1 BGG; Disability Pension Discontinuation Appeal Upheld: The court reasoned that although the appellant reported ongoing symptoms and sought further treatment, the medical documentation did not conclusively establish that the work capacity limitation had worsened or that the previous assessment of residual capacity was erroneous, thus upholding the decision to cease the pension payments as the documented medical condition did not warrant a continued entitlement based on the existing evidence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenrente Rentenaufhebung medizinische Gründe Leistungseinstellung Rentenanspruch Invaliditätsbemessung Invalidenversicherung (Einstellung der Rente) | Invalidenversicherung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG
This provision is the basis for the dismissal of the appeal on the merits concerning the cessation of the disability pension.
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
This provision was used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision of the highest court in the canton.
Art. 67 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision was applied to decide on the costs of the federal court proceedings.
KI-generiert
I 2020 10
Disability Pension Cessation Upheld Despite Flawed Medical Review
I 2022 64
Claimant's Disability Pension Suspension Upheld Due to Contradictory Evidence of Capacity
I 2022 33
Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity
I 2017 43
Appeal Dismissed: Disability Insurance Benefits Cessation Upheld
I 2022 58
Pension Discontinuation Upheld After Disability Revision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG

This provision is the basis for the dismissal of the appeal on the merits concerning the cessation of the disability pension.

Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

This provision was used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision of the highest court in the canton.

Art. 67 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was applied to decide on the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 104 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Einstellung der Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: