Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2019 80 • VG SZ I 2019 80 KI-generiert

Dispute Over Sickness Daily Benefits

Geschäftsnummer I 2019 80
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a dispute over sickness daily benefits under health insurance law, where the claimant sued for benefits and the defendant counterclaimed. The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented in the omitted section of the ruling from January 25, 2021, would address the contractual obligations of the insurer regarding the claimant's reported illness and the validity of the claim under the applicable insurance contract provisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Dispute Over Sickness Daily Benefits: The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented in the omitted section of the ruling from January 25, 2021, would address the contractual obligations of the insurer regarding the claimant's reported illness and the validity of the claim under the applicable insurance contract provisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Krankengeldversicherung Gesundheitsbezogene Angaben Versicherungsvertrag vertragliche Pflichten Widerklage Überversicherung
KI-generiert
I 2017 13
Accident Insurance Daily Sickness Benefit Calculation Dispute
II 2018 21
Insurance Benefit Dispute Over Undisclosed Spinal Condition
I 2025 5
Claimant v. Insurer: Sickness Benefits Dispute Over Conflicting Medical Evidence
I 2022 40
Insured Recovers Sickness Benefits Despite Alleged Pre-Existing Condition Misrepresentation
I 2023 52
Claimant v. Insurer Regarding Continued Sickness Benefits

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 80 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 25. Januar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin und Widerbeklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Beklagte und Widerklägerin, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Krankentaggeld nach VVG) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: