Insurance Benefits Denial for Trip-Related Injury
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant sought accident insurance benefits for an injury sustained during a trip, claiming it was work-related, but the lower court denied the claim, finding insufficient evidence of the requisite causal link between the work activity and the accident. The court reasoned that the accident, which occurred during a leisure activity at the destination, was not sufficiently connected to the purpose of the business trip to qualify as an insured work accident under the applicable legal framework, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny benefits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertInsurance Benefits Denial for Trip-Related Injury: The court reasoned that the accident, which occurred during a leisure activity at the destination, was not sufficiently connected to the purpose of the business trip to qualify as an insured work accident under the applicable legal framework, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny benefits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 8 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Juni 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Leistungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: