Insurance Benefits Denial for Chronic Pain Syndrome
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellant sought disability insurance benefits following a work accident that resulted in a chronic pain syndrome, with the insurance provider denying benefits based on a medical assessment concluding the appellant was capable of earning at least half the previous income. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the medical assessment established that the appellant's remaining work capacity was sufficient to allow for at least a 50% gainful employment, which is the threshold for denying full disability benefits, and thus the appellant failed to demonstrate a greater restriction on earning capacity justifying the requested benefit level.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertInsurance Benefits Denial for Chronic Pain Syndrome: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the medical assessment established that the appellant's remaining work capacity was sufficient to allow for at least a 50% gainful employment, which is the threshold for denying full disability benefits, and thus the appellant failed to demonstrate a greater restriction on earning capacity justifying the requested benefit level.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 76 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. März 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: