Disability Pension Denial After Vocational Rehabilitation Finding
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe claimant, insured under the disability insurance, appealed a decision from the cantonal insurance office that denied continued disability pension benefits after a vocational rehabilitation attempt. The insured had been granted benefits due to an illness causing limited earning capacity, but the insurer terminated the benefit after an evaluation of a vocational rehabilitation measure indicated the insured could re-enter the labor market to some extent. The court ultimately upheld the denial of benefits because the medical evidence, supported by the rehabilitation findings, demonstrated that the claimant retained sufficient residual earning capacity in the general labor market, thereby failing to meet the threshold for continued total invalidity, even if the specific prior occupation was no longer viable.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertDisability Pension Denial After Vocational Rehabilitation Finding: The insured had been granted benefits due to an illness causing limited earning capacity, but the insurer terminated the benefit after an evaluation of a vocational rehabilitation measure indicated the insured could re-enter the labor market to some extent. The court ultimately upheld the denial of benefits because the medical evidence, supported by the rehabilitation findings, demonstrated that the claimant retained sufficient residual earning capacity in the general labor market, thereby failing to meet the threshold for continued total invalidity, even if the specific prior occupation was no longer viable.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 52 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n D.________, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen / Rente) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: