Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2019 20 • VG SZ I 2019 20 KI-generiert

Accident Insurance Bodily Injury Appeal

Geschäftsnummer I 2019 20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision related to accident insurance regarding bodily injury, where the appellants challenged the prior ruling. The court reached its verdict based on an analysis of the evidence presented to determine the validity and scope of the claimed accident and resulting bodily harm under the relevant insurance regulations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV, Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG; Accident Insurance Bodily Injury Appeal: The court reached its verdict based on an analysis of the evidence presented to determine the validity and scope of the claimed accident and resulting bodily harm under the relevant insurance regulations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör Körperverletzung Versicherungsreglement unfallkausale Körperschädigung Versicherungsleistungsbegehren Unfallversicherungsorgan

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV
The court dismissed the appeal because the constitutional right to be heard (Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV) was not violated.
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision.
Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG
The court ruled that the State does not bear the costs of the federal appeal.
KI-generiert
I 2021 56
Accident Insurance Causation Appeal
I 2019 11
Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim
I 2021 78
Accident Insurance Causation Dispute
I 2022 37
Accident Insurance Benefit Refusal and Recovery Appeal
I 2020 20
Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV

The court dismissed the appeal because the constitutional right to be heard (Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV) was not violated.

Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision.

Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG

The court ruled that the State does not bear the costs of the federal appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Unfallversicherung (Unfall; Körperschädigung