Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2018 95 • VG SZ I 2018 95 KI-generiert

Asset Distribution Annulment Based on Material Error in Divorce Settlement

Geschäftsnummer I 2018 95
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual sued four defendants, seeking the annulment of a distribution of assets that occurred during a divorce proceeding, claiming the distribution agreement was void due to a material error regarding the value of certain assets. The court reasoned that the claim for annulment based on a material error requires the error to be so significant that, had the correct facts been known, the agreement would not have been concluded, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged error in asset valuation was sufficient to render the entire agreement void under the relevant legal standard for challenging contractual declarations based on mistake.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Asset Distribution Annulment Based on Material Error in Divorce Settlement: The court reasoned that the claim for annulment based on a material error requires the error to be so significant that, had the correct facts been known, the agreement would not have been concluded, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged error in asset valuation was sufficient to render the entire agreement void under the relevant legal standard for challenging contractual declarations based on mistake.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vereinbarung über die Nebenfolgen der Ehescheidung offensichtliches Versehen Bewertung von Aktiven Sachverhaltsirrtum zivilrechtliche Nichtigkeitserklärung unrechtmässige Verwendung von Vermögenswerten
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 95 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 11. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________ (ehemals D.________), \n2. E.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin F.________, \n3. G.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. H.________, \n4. I.________, \n Beklagte, |\n

\n\n

\n