Occupational Injury Compensation Appeal: Residual Earning Capacity Assessment
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn individual appealed a decision concerning a claim for compensation following an occupational injury that resulted in a permanent reduction of earning capacity, arguing that the assessment of the residual earning capacity in the initial ruling was too low. The court reasoned that the initial determination of the claimant's residual earning capacity, based on the established medical assessment of the functional deficits and the current labor market situation, was correct and that the appeal lacked sufficient grounds to warrant a revision of the established degree of disability.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertOccupational Injury Compensation Appeal: Residual Earning Capacity Assessment: The court reasoned that the initial determination of the claimant's residual earning capacity, based on the established medical assessment of the functional deficits and the current labor market situation, was correct and that the appeal lacked sufficient grounds to warrant a revision of the established degree of disability.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 75 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, \n Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n