Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2018 70 • VG SZ I 2018 70 KI-generiert

Disability Assessment Appeal Under Social Security Legislation

Geschäftsnummer I 2018 70
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a decision concerning a claim related to an accident, where the core issue revolved around the interpretation and application of legal provisions regarding the assessment of occupational and non-occupational disability following the incident. The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly applied the relevant statutory criteria for calculating the degree of disability based on the established medical evidence and the parameters set forth in the governing social security legislation, thereby upholding the original determination.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Disability Assessment Appeal Under Social Security Legislation: The court reasoned that the lower authority correctly applied the relevant statutory criteria for calculating the degree of disability based on the established medical evidence and the parameters set forth in the governing social security legislation, thereby upholding the original determination.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invaliditätsbemessung Sozialversicherungsrecht medizinische Beweismittel Arbeitsunfälle Invaliditätsversicherung Neuanmeldung für Invalidenleistungen Unfallversicherung (Kausalität) | Unfallversicherung
KI-generiert
I 2020 57
Appeal Regarding Accident Insurance Benefits and Disability Assessment
I 2022 2
Social Insurance Disability Assessment Appeal Upheld
I 2020 18
Appeal Regarding Disability Benefits and Medical Assessment Validity
I 2022 67
Disability Benefits Appeal Following Work Accident Assessment Discrepancy
I 2024 34
Social Insurance Disability Benefits Appeal Reversal Due to Inadequate Medical Assessment

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 70 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n