Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2018 59 • VG SZ I 2018 59 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Denial of Lump-Sum Disability Payment for Missed Appointment

Geschäftsnummer I 2018 59
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding disability insurance, specifically challenging the refusal to grant a lump-sum payment related to a missed appointment. The court found that the appellant, despite a medical need for assistance during travel, had failed to ensure their presence at the scheduled appointment, which led to the denial of the payment. The court reasoned that the obligation to appear for scheduled assessments rests with the insured person, and in the absence of a valid justification for non-attendance, the administrative body was correct in refusing the lump-sum compensation for the missed appointment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Denial of Lump-Sum Disability Payment for Missed Appointment: The court found that the appellant, despite a medical need for assistance during travel, had failed to ensure their presence at the scheduled appointment, which led to the denial of the payment. The court reasoned that the obligation to appear for scheduled assessments rests with the insured person, and in the absence of a valid justification for non-attendance, the administrative body was correct in refusing the lump-sum compensation for the missed appointment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Entschädigung für Invalidität Amtshilfe Reiseversicherung medizinische Gründe sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit Kollokationsklage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 BGG
The appeal is rejected because the appellant did not provide sufficient justification for the alleged errors, as required by the procedure.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs for the federal litigation.
KI-generiert
I 2018 49
Appeal Regarding Denial of Attendance Allowance Entitlement
I 2019 83
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal
I 2022 61
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Over Income Calculation and Failure to Consider Prior Incapacity
I 2022 21
Claimant's Appeal of Disability Benefits Ripe for Review Denied

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 BGG

The appeal is rejected because the appellant did not provide sufficient justification for the alleged errors, as required by the procedure.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs for the federal litigation.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Invalidenversicherung (Non-Show-Pauschale /