Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2018 44 • VG SZ I 2018 44 KI-generiert

Accident Insurance Pension Calculation and Residual Earning Capacity

Geschäftsnummer I 2018 44
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An insured individual appealed a decision regarding the calculation of their accident insurance pension, which resulted from a work-related accident causing permanent disability. The court reviewed whether the previous instance correctly assessed the insured's residual earning capacity after the accident by comparing it to the hypothetical earnings in the profession they would have practiced without the injury. The court found that the assessment of residual earning capacity, based on the individual's ability to perform alternative work in a comparable professional field given their education and experience, was legally sound and did not constitute an arbitrary evaluation of the factual evidence.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Accident Insurance Pension Calculation and Residual Earning Capacity: The court reviewed whether the previous instance correctly assessed the insured's residual earning capacity after the accident by comparing it to the hypothetical earnings in the profession they would have practiced without the injury. The court found that the assessment of residual earning capacity, based on the individual's ability to perform alternative work in a comparable professional field given their education and experience, was legally sound and did not constitute an arbitrary evaluation of the factual evidence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenrente der Unfallversicherung Rentenberechnung Resterwerbsfähigkeit versicherter Verdienst Beurteilung der Arbeitsfähigkeit Überprüfung der Invalidenrente Unfallversicherung (Rentenhöhe) | Unfallversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 44 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Rentenhöhe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: