Appeal on Causality in Accident Insurance Coverage
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case involved an appeal concerning accident insurance coverage, specifically questioning the causal link between an insured event and subsequent injury. The appellant sought compensation based on an accident, but the lower instance found the connection insufficiently established. The court reasoned that for accident insurance benefits to be triggered, the claimed physical or psychological impairment must demonstrably be the direct, proximate consequence of the reported accident, and the evidence presented did not meet the required threshold for establishing this necessary causality.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppeal on Causality in Accident Insurance Coverage: The appellant sought compensation based on an accident, but the lower instance found the connection insufficiently established. The court reasoned that for accident insurance benefits to be triggered, the claimed physical or psychological impairment must demonstrably be the direct, proximate consequence of the reported accident, and the evidence presented did not meet the required threshold for establishing this necessary causality.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 28 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Kausalität) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: