Claimant v. Insurance Provider: Disability Benefits Denial Affirmed
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn insured individual sought disability insurance benefits, claiming an inability to work, which was initially denied by the administrative body. The claimant appealed this decision, challenging the assessment of their residual earning capacity despite a medical condition. The court affirmed the lower body's decision, reasoning that the medical reports, including the latest one, did not establish a significant reduction in the claimant's earning capacity in the relevant labor market to justify the granting of disability benefits according to the established legal criteria.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertClaimant v. Insurance Provider: Disability Benefits Denial Affirmed: The claimant appealed this decision, challenging the assessment of their residual earning capacity despite a medical condition. The court affirmed the lower body's decision, reasoning that the medical reports, including the latest one, did not establish a significant reduction in the claimant's earning capacity in the relevant labor market to justify the granting of disability benefits according to the established legal criteria.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 27 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: