Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2018 25 • VG SZ I 2018 25 KI-generiert

Accident Insurance Expert Assessment Body Selection Appeal

Geschäftsnummer I 2018 25
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought to appeal an intermediate decision regarding the selection of an expert assessment body for an accident insurance matter. The appellant challenged the selection made by the lower instance, which had appointed a specific medical expert. The court reasoned that the law governing accident insurance grants the administrative authority the discretion to appoint the expert assessment body, and in the absence of specific legal criteria mandating a different choice, the court could not substitute its own assessment for that of the authority, thus upholding the intermediate decision concerning the expert assessment body.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Accident Insurance Expert Assessment Body Selection Appeal: The appellant challenged the selection made by the lower instance, which had appointed a specific medical expert. The court reasoned that the law governing accident insurance grants the administrative authority the discretion to appoint the expert assessment body, and in the absence of specific legal criteria mandating a different choice, the court could not substitute its own assessment for that of the authority, thus upholding the intermediate decision concerning the expert assessment body.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Unfallversicherungsorgan Gutachterauswahl Entscheidungen auf medizinischem Gebiet Anstellungsbehörde Ermessen der Verwaltung Beurteilungskriterien
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 25 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Zwischenverfügung betr. Gutachterstelle) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: