Accident Insurance Integrity Impairment Compensation Appeal Upheld
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case concerned an appeal against a decision regarding accident insurance, specifically concerning the compensation for integrity impairment. The appellant sought a reassessment of the compensation awarded following an accident. The court reviewed the previous decision and the factual basis, ultimately upholding the prior determination by confirming that the assessment of the severity of the residual impairment, which formed the basis for the compensation amount, was legally sound and not factually incorrect or arbitrary under the applicable insurance regulations.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAccident Insurance Integrity Impairment Compensation Appeal Upheld: The appellant sought a reassessment of the compensation awarded following an accident. The court reviewed the previous decision and the factual basis, ultimately upholding the prior determination by confirming that the assessment of the severity of the residual impairment, which formed the basis for the compensation amount, was legally sound and not factually incorrect or arbitrary under the applicable insurance regulations.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 24 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Integritätsentschädigung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: