Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2018 22 • VG SZ I 2018 22 KI-generiert

Disability Insurance Reintegration Measures Appeal Following Judicial Remand

Geschäftsnummer I 2018 22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding disability insurance, specifically in relation to reintegration measures following a judicial remand, where the appellant sought further action after a prior court ruling. The court determined the outcome based on the prior judicial instruction and the subsequent administrative steps taken by the insurance office, concluding whether the required reassessment or implementation of integration measures had been properly addressed or needed further consideration under the applicable disability insurance law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Disability Insurance Reintegration Measures Appeal Following Judicial Remand: The court determined the outcome based on the prior judicial instruction and the subsequent administrative steps taken by the insurance office, concluding whether the required reassessment or implementation of integration measures had been properly addressed or needed further consideration under the applicable disability insurance law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invaliditätsversicherung Neuanmeldung für Invalidenleistungen Integrationsmassnahmen Prozessrecht Wiederaufleben der Versicherteneigenschaft Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids
KI-generiert
I 2024 1
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal
I 2017 62
Disability Insurance Benefit Appeal
I 2020 73
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal
I 2019 18
Appeal Against Disability Denial Remanded for Further Medical Clarification
I 2017 51
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Agency: Denial of Benefits Appeal Remanded for Re-evaluation

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 22 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Eingliederungsmassnahmen nach \n gerichtlicher Rückweisung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: