Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Massage Costs
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case involved a dispute over coverage for massage costs under a supplementary health insurance policy, where the claimant sought reimbursement from the insurer. The court reasoned that the insurer was not obligated to cover the massage costs because the provided medical certificate, while confirming the necessity of treatment, failed to sufficiently specify the type, frequency, and duration of the prescribed massages, which were required under the specific terms of the supplementary insurance policy for reimbursement.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertInsurance Coverage Dispute Over Massage Costs: The court reasoned that the insurer was not obligated to cover the massage costs because the provided medical certificate, while confirming the necessity of treatment, failed to sufficiently specify the type, frequency, and duration of the prescribed massages, which were required under the specific terms of the supplementary insurance policy for reimbursement.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 111 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 10. April 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Forderung aus Zusatzversicherung zum KVG; Massage-Kosten) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: