Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2017 45 • VG SZ I 2017 45 KI-generiert

Insurance Benefits Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Work Capacity

Geschäftsnummer I 2017 45
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought disability insurance benefits following a work-related accident resulting in an impaired ability to work, but the initial insurance provider denied the claim based on a specialist's opinion suggesting the claimant could still perform sedentary work, leading to an appeal. The court reviewed the medical documentation and expert findings, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision that the objective medical evidence did not sufficiently substantiate a degree of incapacity that warranted the continuation or granting of disability benefits beyond what had already been assessed, thereby upholding the denial based on the medical expert's assessment of residual capacity for work.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Benefits Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Work Capacity: The court reviewed the medical documentation and expert findings, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision that the objective medical evidence did not sufficiently substantiate a degree of incapacity that warranted the continuation or granting of disability benefits beyond what had already been assessed, thereby upholding the denial based on the medical expert's assessment of residual capacity for work.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Leistung der Invalidenversicherung Arbeitsfähigkeit medizinische Beweismittel Unfallversicherungsleistungen Versicherungsleistungsanspruch Bemessung der Arbeitsunfähigkeit Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Oktober 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n D.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. David Husmann, \n Alderstrasse 40, 8008 Zürich, Postfach, 8034 Zürich, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: