Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2017 43 • VG SZ I 2017 43 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed: Disability Insurance Benefits Cessation Upheld

Geschäftsnummer I 2017 43
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant challenged a decision by the social insurance office that discontinued their disability insurance benefits, arguing they were still partially incapacitated and could perform some work activity. The court reviewed the medical evidence and expert opinions regarding the appellant's residual capacity and determined that the lower instance had correctly assessed the medical situation, concluding that the appellant retained sufficient residual earning capacity on the labor market to warrant the cessation of benefits, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed: Disability Insurance Benefits Cessation Upheld: The court reviewed the medical evidence and expert opinions regarding the appellant's residual capacity and determined that the lower instance had correctly assessed the medical situation, concluding that the appellant retained sufficient residual earning capacity on the labor market to warrant the cessation of benefits, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einstellung der Invalidenrenten Versicherungsleistung der Sozialversicherung medizinische Beweismittel sozialversicherungsrechtliches Klageverfahren Revision von Invalidenleistungen Invaliditätsversicherung Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert
I 2019 15
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Decision Upheld
I 2021 65
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2023 46
Disability Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2021 44
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2017 103
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 43 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: