Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2017 4 • VG SZ I 2017 4 KI-generiert

Disability Pension Discontinuation Following Vocational Rehabilitation Review

Geschäftsnummer I 2017 4
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance benefits, stemming from a previous vocational rehabilitation measure that the insurance office subsequently discontinued, leading to a review of the entitlement to a disability pension. The court reasoned that since the claimant had regained sufficient earning capacity after the conclusion of the rehabilitation program, which was the basis for the prior benefit decision, the administrative body was justified in reviewing and ultimately discontinuing the disability pension due to the non-occurrence of the prerequisites for its continued payment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Disability Pension Discontinuation Following Vocational Rehabilitation Review: The court reasoned that since the claimant had regained sufficient earning capacity after the conclusion of the rehabilitation program, which was the basis for the prior benefit decision, the administrative body was justified in reviewing and ultimately discontinuing the disability pension due to the non-occurrence of the prerequisites for its continued payment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Überprüfung der Invalidenrente berufliche Rehabilitation Rentenanspruch Weiterausrichtung von Leistungen Versicherungsleistungen Neuanmeldung für Invalidenleistungen Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Prof.Dr.iur. Hardy Landolt, LL.M., \n Schweizerhofstrasse 14, Postfach 568, 8750 Glarus, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: