Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I 2017 23 • VG SZ I 2017 23 KI-generiert

Denial of Invalidity Pension Pending Vocational Rehabilitation

Geschäftsnummer I 2017 23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant appealed a decision denying them an invalidity insurance pension, stemming from an initial request filed in 2017. The court reasoned that although the appellant suffered from a permanent work incapacity exceeding fifty percent, the relevant medical reports indicated that the appellant had not yet maximized their possibilities for vocational rehabilitation, specifically concerning a necessary vocational change, and therefore, the claim for an invalidity pension was premature as the prerequisite for a permanent loss of earning capacity had not yet been fully established.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Denial of Invalidity Pension Pending Vocational Rehabilitation: The court reasoned that although the appellant suffered from a permanent work incapacity exceeding fifty percent, the relevant medical reports indicated that the appellant had not yet maximized their possibilities for vocational rehabilitation, specifically concerning a necessary vocational change, and therefore, the claim for an invalidity pension was premature as the prerequisite for a permanent loss of earning capacity had not yet been fully established.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ruhegehalt wegen Dienstunfähigkeit berufliche Rehabilitation Arbeitsunfähigkeit dauernde Erwerbsunfähigkeit ärztlicher Bericht medizinische Gründe Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 23 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: