Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2017 113 • VG SZ I 2017 113 KI-generiert

Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment

Geschäftsnummer I 2017 113
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought disability insurance benefits for a severe persistent visual impairment that began following an accident, arguing that the resulting limitation prevented substantial gainful employment, despite initial assessments finding no material impediment to the previous occupation. The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG, Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment: The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
optische Beeinträchtigung Invalidenversicherungsleistungen Ruhegehalt wegen Dienstunfähigkeit Versicherungsleistungsbegehren Arbeitsunfallversicherung medizinische Gründe Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) | Invalidenversicherung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG
The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.
Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG
The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.
Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG
This procedural article is cited regarding the decision on the appeal concerning the award of an invalidity pension.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs are allocated based on this provision.
KI-generiert
I 2023 46
Disability Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2019 83
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal
I 2021 65
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2022 14
Appeal of Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG

The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.

Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.

Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG

This procedural article is cited regarding the decision on the appeal concerning the award of an invalidity pension.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are allocated based on this provision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 113 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Luca Barmettler, \n Bahnhofstrasse 8, 6403 Küssnacht, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: