Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2017 100 • VG SZ I 2017 100 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial)

Geschäftsnummer I 2017 100
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant sought disability benefits from the relevant insurance office after being partially employed following an industrial accident, which the insurance office denied based on a medical assessment finding no significant long-term limitations affecting her earning capacity in the current job market. The court upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical assessment, which indicated the claimant could perform work suitable to her training and experience with reasonable accommodations, was factually sound and legally appropriate, thereby supporting the conclusion that the threshold for granting the disability pension had not been met.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial): The court upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical assessment, which indicated the claimant could perform work suitable to her training and experience with reasonable accommodations, was factually sound and legally appropriate, thereby supporting the conclusion that the threshold for granting the disability pension had not been met.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Leistung der Invalidenversicherung Teilarbeitsfähigkeit medizinische Gründe Forderungseingabe Teilentscheid Unfallversicherungsleistungen Invalidenversicherung (Rentenrevision) | Invalidenversicherung
KI-generiert
I 2019 55
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Appeal)
I 2022 69
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld
I 2022 20
Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial
I 2021 44
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2017 73
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 100 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 4. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Petra Oehmke, \n Bahnhofplatz 9, Postfach 976, 8910 Affoltern, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________ (Pensionskasse), \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n