Application for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Insufficient Evidence of Bias
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA party filed an application seeking the recusal of a judge due to alleged bias in connection with a prior legal matter, asserting that the judge's prior involvement created a basis for justifiable doubt regarding impartiality in the current case concerning a request for disqualification. The court dismissed the application, reasoning that the prior judicial action cited by the applicant did not establish any relationship or circumstance that would objectively justify a suspicion of bias or a lack of independence on the part of the presiding judge in the current proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertApplication for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Insufficient Evidence of Bias: The court dismissed the application, reasoning that the prior judicial action cited by the applicant did not establish any relationship or circumstance that would objectively justify a suspicion of bias or a lack of independence on the part of the presiding judge in the current proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 29. Juni 2023 \n BEK 2023 72 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegnerin, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n
\n (Gesuch vom 8. Mai 2023, JGO 2022 1);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: