Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BEK 2023 126 • KG SZ BEK 2023 126 KI-generiert

Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied

Geschäftsnummer BEK 2023 126
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual, who was the accused and applicant, sought the recusal of a judge in an ongoing legal matter by filing a motion, which the opposing party opposed. The court found that the asserted facts, relating to a perceived professional relationship between the judge and the opposing party, did not establish a ground for judicial bias or a reasonable apprehension of partiality as required by law. Therefore, the court dismissed the request for the judge's recusal because the applicant failed to demonstrate a situation that would justify disqualification.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied: The court found that the asserted facts, relating to a perceived professional relationship between the judge and the opposing party, did not establish a ground for judicial bias or a reasonable apprehension of partiality as required by law. Therefore, the court dismissed the request for the judge's recusal because the applicant failed to demonstrate a situation that would justify disqualification.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ausstandsbegehren Befangenheit des Richters Zeugnisverweigerungsrecht Trennungsklage falsche Anschuldigung Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit Ausstand | Ausstandsbegehren
KI-generiert
BEK 2023 70
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Insufficient Showing of Bias
BEK 2025 29
Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied
BEK 2019 139
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Insufficient Showing of Bias
BEK 2025 70
Motion to Recuse Judge for Apparent Bias Denied
BEK 2021 144
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Prior Unfavorable Rulings

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 20. November 2023 \n BEK 2023 126 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Gesuchsteller, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n

\n (Gesuch vom 14. September 2023, SU 2022 9437);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: