Private Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA private litigant appealed a decision by the cantonal public prosecutor's office to discontinue criminal proceedings, which was the second appeal in the matter. The court considered the procedural history, noting that the initial discontinuation order was issued following a decision by the lower court that had previously overturned the prosecutor's first discontinuation order. The appellate court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings, reasoning that the prosecutor had properly exercised their discretion in determining that the continuation of the investigation was disproportionate to the public interest given the circumstances established during the investigation.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 353 StPO, Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 62 BGG; Private Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings: The court considered the procedural history, noting that the initial discontinuation order was issued following a decision by the lower court that had previously overturned the prosecutor's first discontinuation order. The appellate court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings, reasoning that the prosecutor had properly exercised their discretion in determining that the continuation of the investigation was disproportionate to the public interest given the circumstances established during the investigation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe court applied this article to dismiss the appeal, as it relates to the procedural basis for the decision on the appeal.
The court used this article to rule on the distribution of procedural costs following the decision.
This article was cited in relation to the decision on court fees.
Volltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 8. August 2022 \n BEK 2022 83 \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (zweiter Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 2. November 2020, SUB 2019 589);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: