Appeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision regarding the finality of a penalty order, which was issued after the defendant failed to appeal the initial penalty order within the prescribed timeframe. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal against the penalty order itself was inadmissible because it was not filed within the statutory period following the notification of the penalty order, and the subsequent appeal against the prosecutor's subsequent declaration of finality was therefore also unfounded as it challenged a determination based on the prior, unchallenged finality.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal against the penalty order itself was inadmissible because it was not filed within the statutory period following the notification of the penalty order, and the subsequent appeal against the prosecutor's subsequent declaration of finality was therefore also unfounded as it challenged a determination based on the prior, unchallenged finality.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 8. Juli 2022 \n BEK 2022 101 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 23. Mai 2022, SU 2021 8980);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: