Appeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case involves an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding definitive legal authorization (Rechtsöffnung), where the appellant challenged an order granted to the respondent. The court considered whether the lower court correctly determined that the conditions for definitive legal authorization were met based on the presented documents, ultimately upholding the initial decision because the evidence presented by the applicant was sufficient to establish the claim for which definitive authorization was sought, as required by the relevant procedural rules for such relief.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppeal Regarding Definitive Legal Authorization: The court considered whether the lower court correctly determined that the conditions for definitive legal authorization were met based on the presented documents, ultimately upholding the initial decision because the evidence presented by the applicant was sufficient to establish the claim for which definitive authorization was sought, as required by the relevant procedural rules for such relief.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 20. April 2020 \n BEK 2020 12 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Cécile Annen. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 20. Dezember 2019, ZES 2019 108);-
\n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: