Appeal of Refusal for Provisional Debt Collection Proceedings Based on Unenforceable Claim
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA petitioner appealed a lower court's decision regarding provisional debt collection proceedings, specifically challenging the refusal to grant provisional relief in a debt enforcement matter initiated based on a document that was allegedly not an enforceable claim. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the underlying document did not constitute a final judgment, arbitral award, or other officially recognized instrument establishing a clear, undisputed monetary claim sufficient to warrant the summary issuance of provisional debt collection proceedings under the relevant statute.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppeal of Refusal for Provisional Debt Collection Proceedings Based on Unenforceable Claim: The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the underlying document did not constitute a final judgment, arbitral award, or other officially recognized instrument establishing a clear, undisputed monetary claim sufficient to warrant the summary issuance of provisional debt collection proceedings under the relevant statute.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 24. April 2017 \n BEK 2016 172 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Florian Farner. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________ |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 16. November 2016, ZES 2016 117);-
\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: