Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/849/2009 • CJ GE ATAS/849/2009 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/849/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The matter involved an appeal filed by an individual challenging a decision from the Cantonal Disability Insurance Office dated February 10, 2009, which had refused the granting of disability insurance benefits. Following the filing of the appeal and subsequent procedural steps, the court noted that at the hearing on the day of the decision, the appellant formally withdrew the recourse. Consequently, the Cantonal Social Insurance Tribunal accepted the withdrawal, canceled the case from its roll, and waived the collection of any fees.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits: Following the filing of the appeal and subsequent procedural steps, the court noted that at the hearing on the day of the decision, the appellant formally withdrew the recourse. Consequently, the Cantonal Social Insurance Tribunal accepted the withdrawal, canceled the case from its roll, and waived the collection of any fees.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Versicherungsleistungsentzug Leistung der Invalidenversicherung Sozialversicherungsverfahren Wiederaufleben der Invalidenrente Einstellung von Invalidenrenten Entzug der unentgeltlichen Rechtspflege

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision, implicitly referenced by the decision not to charge fees despite the withdrawal, would typically govern court fees, but since the dispositive explicitly only waives the fee, no specific cost article is strictly cited for that action. However, if we strictly adhere to citing articles *explicitly* mentioned in the dispositive, and no such article is present for orders 1, 2, or 3, the output should be empty. In this specific case, orders 1, 2, and 3 do not explicitly cite any legal articles.
KI-generiert
A/4039/2015
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits
A/763/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision
A/1557/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision
A/1227/2008
Withdrawal of Disability Insurance Appeal
A/2961/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision, implicitly referenced by the decision not to charge fees despite the withdrawal, would typically govern court fees, but since the dispositive explicitly only waives the fee, no specific cost article is strictly cited for that action. However, if we strictly adhere to citing articles *explicitly* mentioned in the dispositive, and no such article is present for orders 1, 2, or 3, the output should be empty. In this specific case, orders 1, 2, and 3 do not explicitly cite any legal articles.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/802/2009 ATAS/849/2009

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 4 du 24 juin 2009

En la cause

Madame B_________, domiciliée à Genève, comparant avec recourante élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Nils DE DARDEL

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE, sis rue intimé de Lyon 97, Genève

Siégeant : Juliana BALDE, Présidente; Christine LUZZATTO et Monique STOLLER FÜLLEMANN, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision de l'Office cantonal de l'assurance-invalidité (ci-après OCAI) du 10 février 2009 refusant l’octroi de prestations de l’assurance-invalidité à Madame B__________;

Vu le recours interjeté le 9 mars 2009 par l’intéressée, par l’intermédiaire de son conseil Me Nils DE DARDEL, avocat ;

Vu le complément au recours du 8 avril 2009 ;

Vu la réponse de l’OCAI du 15 mai 2009 ;

Vu l’audience de comparution personnelle des parties de ce jour au cours de laquelle la recourante a déclaré retirer son recours ;

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Renonce à percevoir un émolument.

3. Raye la cause du rôle.

La Présidente :

La greffière :

Juliana BALDE Isabelle CASTILLO

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/802/2009