Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
ATAS/838/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/838/2005 KI-generiert

Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/838/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought to recover damages for a breach of warranty regarding materials supplied for the construction of a municipal improvement project, alleging the materials failed to meet specified engineering standards, causing delays and increased costs. The court reasoned that the contract's integration clause barred the use of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, and that the written specifications themselves contained the entire agreement regarding material quality; furthermore, the record did not support a claim of fraudulent inducement or a general breach of warranty independent of the specific contractual terms. Therefore, absent a clear breach of the explicit written warranty or proof of fraud, the appellant could not recover based on extrinsic evidence or general implied warranties.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Warranty in Construction Contract Based on Extrinsic Evidence: The court reasoned that the contract's integration clause barred the use of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, and that the written specifications themselves contained the entire agreement regarding material quality; furthermore, the record did not support a claim of fraudulent inducement or a general breach of warranty independent of the specific contractual terms. Therefore, absent a clear breach of the explicit written warranty or proof of fraud, the appellant could not recover based on extrinsic evidence or general implied warranties.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bauwerkvertrag vertraglicher Schadenersatz Beweismass Sachgewährleistung Tonträgervertrag Verstoss gegen Treu und Glauben

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

                 

!!"

 ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $"

%&'   ( ) *+*   



 !"#$%&$''" '"' (&$'')$ '



$

    *    *!$# '&4' *"'!+,!-$%. '/ #$01,2!3233    0

       

   .252. 

'"'',%277+!&#'389277+!$#:'/

;''9/;'$%$#$<$$!-; %$';$&/

! %" , - $" ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $" ( .++*   / 0+*1*'' 2 .3 4 5 $67

3= $<    *    *'-;#$' %< !<$$$$!#>'#?$ '$$#&!"$$'+(7774=#''$$"#$=

2= ;@'"$$-'A=

1=  $ ? #$ '  -; $ % - $$ "" $ %&   "#$ A ' ;%$ ' $! '; <  4 ' " ';$A 277+=

,= $< ''%-#&:'!$' -;?'&#=

+= ##$';$=+7 !4"#$'-;#%$4" $#&$B$''&'179':$4$## ""'&'& A4&'&'!*CDEC4-0!077,   !$?"#='&#$B$#>&="&"'$F G'-?$"$-'&$'&A$$#' '&$$-&/AG?##-"$4$"#%'"'$$ $'&/G#$>$'#&$$=*"&" $$ #  $ &&"$ &"&&  $$ G AG $ G .'!  A4&'&'##$"$:-; '%'&%A="&"'"$"@ ' #%! - $ 9$!  -  '& $$-& $ ;%## ' -&$&?#&'&$H$=312!370$37IG=    >44:F &'$F       *@% J K A*

#4"'#&$B$$$4&?#$-;<;444&'& '#>44



562+5277+