Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/806/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/806/2014 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Decision

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/806/2014
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a supplementary benefits service decision primarily concerning an outstanding medical invoice of CHF 88.30, but subsequently informed the court upon receiving notice of a personal appearance hearing that they were withdrawing both their opposition and their appeal. The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the roll.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits Decision: The court acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeal and ordered the case to be removed from the roll.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ergänzungsleistungen Rückzug des Rechtsvorschlags Entzug von Sozialversicherungsleistungen persönliche Anhörung Wiedererwägung der Invalidenrente Verweis ad separatum

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is typically cited in the dispositive for ordering costs when a final decision is rendered, although it is not explicitly quoted as the basis for ordering costs in this specific, very short dispositive (which only orders taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case). However, in standard Swiss practice for such outcomes, costs (if any were ordered, though none are explicitly mentioned here) would fall under this article. Since the prompt strictly requires inclusion ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive, and no articles are explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, the result must be an empty array, as no provisions meet the strict criteria for inclusion.
KI-generiert
A/1457/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/1947/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/2615/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Supplementary Benefits Service Decision
A/4080/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
A/1776/2014
Claimant Withdraws Appeal of Supplementary Benefits Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is typically cited in the dispositive for ordering costs when a final decision is rendered, although it is not explicitly quoted as the basis for ordering costs in this specific, very short dispositive (which only orders taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case). However, in standard Swiss practice for such outcomes, costs (if any were ordered, though none are explicitly mentioned here) would fall under this article. Since the prompt strictly requires inclusion ONLY if explicitly cited in the dispositive, and no articles are explicitly cited in orders 1 and 2, the result must be an empty array, as no provisions meet the strict criteria for inclusion.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/852/2014 ATAS/806/2014

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 27 juin 2014 9ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à COINTRIN recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLEMENTAIRES, sis intimé DEAS - SPC; Route de Chêne 54; Case postale 6375, GENEVE

Siégeant : Francine PAYOT ZEN-RUFFINEN, Présidente; Pierre-Bernard PETITAT et Jean-Pierre WAVRE, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition du 25 février 2014, Vu le recours du 18 mars 2014 portant principalement sur une facture médicale de CHF 88,30, Vu la réponse du 17 avril 2014, Vu la convocation à l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 23 juin 2014; Attendu qu'à la réception de la convocation la recourante a indiqué qu'elle renonçait à son opposition, et par conséquent, retirait son recours; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Brigitte BABEL Francine PAYOT ZEN- RUFFINEN

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/852/2014