ATAS/782/2007 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/782/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/782/2007 KI-generiert

Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/782/2007

Gericht / Behörde Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Rechtsordnung

Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)

Entscheiddatum 2007-07-04

Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)

Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned the proper calculation of damages in a breach of contract action, specifically regarding the appropriate measure for lost profits and the application of certain statutory provisions governing commercial transactions. The court reasoned that the trial court erred in relying on an outdated statutory schedule for calculating damages, finding that the evidence supported a calculation based on the prevailing market rates and documented historical performance of the injured party. Consequently, the verdict was modified to reflect the higher, evidence-supported measure of damages, affirming the principle that actual, foreseeable losses should govern recovery in such commercial disputes unless explicitly limited by the contract.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation: The court reasoned that the trial court erred in relying on an outdated statutory schedule for calculating damages, finding that the evidence supported a calculation based on the prevailing market rates and documented historical performance of the injured party. Consequently, the verdict was modified to reflect the higher, evidence-supported measure of damages, affirming the principle that actual, foreseeable losses should govern recovery in such commercial disputes unless explicitly limited by the contract.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

Schadenberechnung Vertragsauslegung entgangener Gewinn gesetzliche Grenzen Werkvertragshaftung Konventionalstrafe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed court costs for the federal court proceedings.

KI-generiert

A/2276/2007

Damages Calculation in Breach of Contract: Lost Profits Methodology

A/1557/2004

Contract Breach Damages Calculation and Lost Profits Speculation

A/1924/2007

Contractual Interpretation of Liquidated Damages Calculation

A/1920/2006

Contractual Interpretation and Damages Calculation Dispute

A/1938/2007

Contract Damages: Lost Profits Versus Overhead Expenses

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed court costs for the federal court proceedings.

Volltext

'()*'*++, !',-*'*++,

! !" "

./ )

0 1 22 *++,

! " #

# !$ " $

& $$ '$$ (% !,#

$$ $ $ $ " $ $ $ " $ %" $ )$ $ #$%*+

!" #$ % &

.)*

12 # 34% 11 35 # .//0 1-6 78# # 8 (# 6# %(#! 5#!190.% # !1901# !%11(%8#1990 :%'5 #2

.2 $7 ,,#1/34%(#! %! # 8(# 6# %#! (#%4 (# % ! 5 # (#!5; (#, < (# 7 !(=#%# 42

>2 34% 5# % 5 !, % , 1- ,!5# # .//0 % !%! %# ',, # 8!.1 5%(#=!% (#%42

?2 @ (#!!A' %#% 2$## # % $ .-#.//0<46# ( (#$!7# $ (#(#$!7#%"## (#%% 8#(4 !(##A% 5#%*-'1*>,#2>/2

*2 < # # %#@%#(# (#!5; (#, B C ,#! # 8 ! * 5# .//0 5 # %#,!#!(#%% #% !(###%(!# 1# 3 %.//>>13 %.//?A&% 8#(4'$$ 2 @ (# %(#%% 8#(4 (#!5;D# 7 '5#>'9,#21*.+3 %.//>2 (#%% #% A % # 4 '!% % #4 %#!2 &% % 5 D# 7 (4 '# # 5 , % 5 # 1+ 5# .//0 # 8 !<(#%% 8#(4%#,!#!A 5 %!%!! 1# .//1>/5# .//>2(# %!4%(#%% 8# (4 -11 ,#2 0/ #!5; %#% 652$## #. .//0 &% 8#(4'$ $ (#%% 8#(4#'!65A9'/0?,#20/A% 5#29 .//0 %45 (% %# # 8!#8%(% $#2#!% =@ < # ! A % # %8# ./// !%!' %#%2

-2 .. .//0 # 8 ! ,#! =@!(= < (#%4 # ,,%!#8'5 #5 *-'1*>,#2>/(##% 9'/0?,#20/(##2! 1.3 .//0#!%! (#% (# !%# ##%%2

02 # ## #1/3 .//0# , %(#% # 8! !## 5 # (#%4# (#%% 8# (4 5 =@!(= %%%%%'5 #(%%!34% 5#2

)-*.).//0 >)*

+2 $#!%!4#!A34#2

12 '#%2.* ,!!## 8#(4(#!5;(#,

5 #5 5%% 5 %!10!8#199>B&C%#!5 4# 1#35 #.///#64(#!# 5#2#<3 %% (E##(#%% #% A(#%4#B#%21..%1.> 5 @ C 34 5#(!%%'#%20>21 ,!!## (#!5; (#, .* 3 19+. BC % A 65 # 8 %# ( 1#F%.//> %(#6<',, # !%!%# B#%21?. C=!%#',, (#%4#8 ! #!(#% % !%# !(#34 5#2

.2 $'#%2..&B5%#5 4#( 1#35 #.///C 5# (#%% #% < #% # 4 % (#%4! ,#!% =#%21..1.>1?1%1?. G#%2>A* &'(( <% (#4 %%A%#,!##B21C2#7<3 %(#%% #% A(#%4###(A ,,!#%#(#%% #% 4%! 5 # 8# (4 = %% !5%% % 5# % (#%% #% 4%!5 # 8#(4= %%!5%% % # 4B,2#%2.?&C2#3% A (#%% #% % A '5 # 8# (4 = %% % # 4 %!#H% % 5# B & 1.+ .>/G &1.9???C2

>2 E(6 34 (# 6# % #! (#%4 (# % ! (#%% #% < #% # 4 (# #2 % (#% %%E(#%# 411(%8#1990E%#(#% 1-,!5# #.//0%A<34% 5#%5=!% #2

### #1/3 .//0#%!#!(#% % (#%% #% =@!(=! !(# # 8(# 6# % 34% !< %82 %, #5! @ # 8!% ! (# ! 34 5#2#!<%# (%( %%# (#!% (#!# %! (#%4 #! (# 34% # 8 (# 6# % 11 35 # .//0 < < ,#734!2

?2 $# 4%# (#%% < (%# 4(# #%9'/0?,#20/% <!(##% *-'1*> ,#2 >/ %!#H% ;% !3A !%! ! (# % %%

)-*.).//0 ?)*

(#!5;!,#2 # %A=@!(%% ?'*>0,#2>*B9'/0?,#20/I.C%@ %%%.+'/0-,#2-*B*-'1*> ,#2>/I.C#%<E%#< %# .>'*>9,#2>/2

*2 ,#!% A 3# (# ( 3# !%# % (# (#%4 3<'%%#,#%(#%% #% #3 % 5#!8!!, #%%(#%% # %A %!#H%(% ## %%@ 2 %!#H%%!%= !4'#%21. '##(#!5;(#, 5 #5 5%% 5 %! 1+ 5# 19+? B .C %= #!4% # @ % (!# # B &1.9. 2>C2

-2 !% # (#J (#!# !%% 4#% % B#%2 0> 2 . % +9"21 #(#!# %#% 51.(%8#19+*C2

KKK

)-*.).//0 *)*

"!# ! !" "

12 5 % ( (# $!7# $ (# (# $!7#$ %"## A%#,!##(%! 190..>'*>9,#2>/A&% 8#(4'$$ ,5#2(% 8#(4 L < %!#H%(% # !#%61-,!5# #.//03<' %%#,#%2

.2 E;%%<8 2

>2 %<(#!#%4#% %2

?2 ,# (#% <E (5% ,## ## %# (#!% ##H% ! >/ 3# 6 % , % (#6 # 8 ,!!# B$7M N#7,< --//? C(#5 ##% 6## % (8 ,#!%=#%2+. ,!!## # 8,!!#10 3 .//* B &CG ! # ## % <# % , % ;(#5%(#%# 4%###%% #G % H%# #! # 8 ,!!# (# 5 (% (# 5 !%# < = % '#%2 ?. &2 (#!% ##H% % ( 6 ( ##% 5<!;(#5 5%H%#3 %A'5 2 4#,, 6# #! %I # " $ ;

( ,#(#!%##H%%% , !=(#% <EAE,, ,!!# # (#4#,,

)-*.).//0

Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

Legislator-Regeste

Schlagwörter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

Verwandte Entscheide

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Volltext