Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/687/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/687/2007 KI-generiert

Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Dispute

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/687/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned a dispute over the enforceability of a restrictive covenant concerning the use of certain property, specifically challenging whether the covenant was properly executed and whether subsequent conduct invalidated its enforcement. The court determined that the covenant was validly established based on the instruments presented and that the alleged modifications or waivers did not sufficiently demonstrate abandonment or invalidation of the restriction, concluding that the covenant remained in effect and enforceable against the current property holder.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Dispute: The court determined that the covenant was validly established based on the instruments presented and that the alleged modifications or waivers did not sufficiently demonstrate abandonment or invalidation of the restriction, concluding that the covenant remained in effect and enforceable against the current property holder.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vollstreckung Bewirkte Beschränkungen Besitzvertrag Streitgegenstand vollstreckbarer Rechtsöffnungstitel Baubeschränkungsdienstbarkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
KI-generiert
A/179/2006
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Dispute
A/2172/2004
Covenant Enforcement Validity Dispute
A/2383/2006
Restrictive Covenant Interpretation and Enforcement
A/228/2004
Restrictive Covenant Enforcement Despite Neighborhood Change
A/683/2004
Enforcement of Restrictive Covenants Against Commercial Use

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

           #$%&#'%%( )#*$(#'%%(

)

 )  )    

+  '

" ,& -" '%%( 



 !"#$#% &'"("' ( )*    



(

++   , ))      (!" -./0 '(1$2#$## #%



                   !"   "

   6$3%6  

))  . )

 ' "  $2 78 $55/ ,++     , )) 6     96':  ;  (<" =   96':  (;'"("''((7 >?  @  < (('((0

  ,(((( '( <A(      "(" (B"  ! ( ( ( $C78$55/0

( "'' $4<"8$55/D'7 ( #!$55/0

 "' #$8$55/,(!"(=,8B(" '  ( 8("0

,8(" =  "(!   >(  ( E'> ' "(  / ! $55/86!F!D " ( %578$55/(8(" ! ((= ('""!(<>'"" (8( >" ''8GA '"  0

'' $%!$55/,  >"!(0

 ' '  $. ! $55/  '( ( "(" <!" >   "(( A " = 7A>( 8B("H

 /)   )

 B "(!'"((!(:92CH#(HGH$;0

 "''('8(<,B7( ,':  B  "   %5 7 > 8(  (<( 9(H C5    <" "   '(A""  ( 6': ;0

' "<E"''('F('A""8  <!7( (((  " ,!'FG!( ,A9<H(#C  '"  !((866': ;0

  " !!( =    !   !!( ( E'( >,(!B(!  !G7"A!(<""'!7 (8(9(#/ ;0

, ,':  "  "(" (<"  ! (  (  (  $C 78$55/ (> "'( $/788(="G" !G$2 <"8("(( :'(" $C<"8$55/0



345.3$55/  6%3%6    ,(    "(" '("  (  $4 <"8 $55/  >  (  (( ,'0

 ' ">(   ( 8B '   ( 8("  ( ,"A( <!7!(< ,!'FG!(0

,  8( , '  > ,!'FG(  ( = (!'  8 ! (H

  ) .  )  )    

"

#H "8B' ( 8("H

$H =''( ,"!!(H

%H <!  '(   >I '8( <!  (  '"( F(   "  %5 7 :  (<( ':  B <" " 9)GJKG<>CC551  ;'8 !(:  ( 'B<!"!(E(H4$ <" " B<" " #/ 7 $552 9 +;0  !"!   (  >   !(< ( !- '8('(A( ( ! (0 ( F(  "  B <" " ' 8 '(  ' 8 "(> E  (  ,(H 1$  +H  '"( F( (  ':  '  (8>"!!!- '8 8(F(7(=,8H  A<<L  '" (L         ) B)   

'<! '"(F(((<"E'(>I=I<<<" " 'A<<





345.3$55/