Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/686/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/686/2007 KI-generiert

Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/686/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court considered whether a ruling regarding an earlier set of findings and conclusions, which modified a judgment in part, precluded the party from raising certain issues regarding the original judgment in a subsequent appeal, particularly concerning the application of a specific legal standard to the admitted facts. The court reasoned that because the earlier ruling was an interlocutory modification that did not address all the issues currently being appealed, and the issues raised in the current appeal were not fully decided or waived in the prior proceedings, the party was not barred by the law of the case doctrine from challenging the specific aspects of the original judgment related to the legal standard applied to the established factual record.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Law of the Case Doctrine and Interlocutory Modification of Judgment: The court reasoned that because the earlier ruling was an interlocutory modification that did not address all the issues currently being appealed, and the issues raised in the current appeal were not fully decided or waived in the prior proceedings, the party was not barred by the law of the case doctrine from challenging the specific aspects of the original judgment related to the legal standard applied to the established factual record.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rechtslehre Anfechtung von Zwischenentscheiden Rechtliche Aspekte Revision eines Entscheids Wirkungen der Vorabentscheidungsurteile Fragepflicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.
KI-generiert
C/2082/2021
Appealability of Interlocutory Evidentiary Rulings
A/2333/2007
Preclusion Doctrines and Prior Judgments
C/20742/2021
Appeal Regarding Interlocutory Evidentiary Rulings Admissibility
A/3146/2006
Statute of Limitations and Law of the Case Doctrine
A/2046/2003
Issue Preclusion in Prior Litigation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

           #$%&#&''( )#$*$#&''(

 )

 )  )+     +  

,  &  -. / &''( 



  !"#$$%&  ' & ( 

(

&&  &    &  &)*!(((+,(+#-. '#/ (!" 011   0 && /    23 4,(+$-#$## #.



                 ! "   

   /$5./  

  "  ( (8" 9 :  ;/,<  (= , 011     0 && /    ;/,<  =  $$ >?$%%3

    $% 8"? $%%3 , @  ( !  @   ( "A!"((@?B8(!(

  ",  0   $. ! $%%3  "(   !! C!,<(!(!,")BD((@0,( (

 0,,       !,( (!" ,    $6 ? $%%7

A,(8,/(, #3?$%%3

(( @0(@( ("(""9?  8( @  ",  "(" !  B""8 0 ( 0? (" (<   ?(," ,((E ?

    B  (  #2 ? $%%3  8A(  " ,  @0((( 03!$%%3

(( @(0,"E  "8A"

0 ?(  (( @    !,(  " (( A,( (( ((@A,(0(,!"  ((( ,( (

0?( 0, (( 4 F"(( ? B>(:







56+%5$%%7  /.5./  

   +) 1  )  )+     +   

#: ((@( ?B>(:

$: 4 F:

.: 8!,( @G,?(8!(,"(H(   "  .% > <  (8( ,<  B 8" " ;&)IJ)8@77%%+  =,? !(<  ( ,B8!"!(A(:6$ 8" " B8" " #3 > $%%- ; 1=K  !"!   (  @   !(8 ( !4 ,?(,(E( ( ! (K ( H(  "  B 8" " , ? ,(  , ? "(@ A  ( 0(:+$ 1:,"(H((,<, ( ?@"!!!4 ,? ?(H(>(90?:



 E88  " (L             & B& 





,8! ,"(H(((8"A,(,E88



56+%5$%%7