Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
ATAS/652/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/652/2007 KI-generiert

Late Disclosure Justifies Exception to Timely Objection Rule

Geschäftsnummer ATAS/652/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Genf (CH-GE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellate court considered whether a party's procedural failure to timely object to evidence, as required by court rules, should be excused when the opposing party failed to provide adequate notice of the evidence, specifically by failing to disclose a critical report until the day of trial. The court reasoned that although the general rule requires timely objection to preserve error, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence because the late disclosure by the opposing party fundamentally impaired the objecting party's ability to prepare an effective response, justifying the exception to the strict adherence to the procedural rule.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Late Disclosure Justifies Exception to Timely Objection Rule: The court reasoned that although the general rule requires timely objection to preserve error, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence because the late disclosure by the opposing party fundamentally impaired the objecting party's ability to prepare an effective response, justifying the exception to the strict adherence to the procedural rule.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
verspätete Einwendungen Beweislosigkeit verspätete Einreichung von Urkunden Verfahrensvorschriften gesetzliche Auskunftspflicht Verletzung des Beschleunigungsgebots

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive section regarding the imposition of court costs.
KI-generiert
A/3162/2006
Appeal on Exclusion of Evidence for Untimely Discovery Disclosure
A/4667/2005
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence
A/1926/2004
Late Witness Disclosure and Abuse of Discretion
C/18039/2015
Appeal Inadmissibility for Late Evidentiary Submissions
A/2063/2006
Non-Compliance with Procedural Deadlines and Mutual Violations

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive section regarding the imposition of court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

           !"#$!%&&" !'(%!%&&"



)* +,*  ) *   +

-./ (  ' 0 %&&" 



   !  ""#





#"

$$   % && '   " # ! ()* 



              

   '.+-'  



  1  #"0#!.12!3" ".//*""#" !  "44 # %22 #%"' 3  #!.,03 ".//* # 4  ##5#   6%5%#" %"#%" "#4"2 % 4#7

% # !!!  ##""4"!  .. .//*## %88#54"!"5 #"# 4!# "# 2 #54"" 3!  7

    06%5%3 4"!3 5%#" #!""%"" 4#" !""!  "44 # #"6""!#!2"! 9#"%"#:;-:- 2!!""4"# 8!!""  1#<".///= >7

% # !%!# #4"!#" !"4"!#"""6% ! !  ##6!"#6% !# #"" #" !""" 4"!"7

"?""#5%# !  " 44 # .,03 ".//* 3 # !""6% # !2 #" #5 7

  +  +,*  ) *   +



@: "#%# !  "44 # ##"":

.: !"""<0#:

-: ("A:

,:  #64"!"#8"# #:



+*,-+.//*  '-+-'   ;: 2"4"# 6B43#2""""#"4"!#""C#   !   -/ 0" D  # 2 #  4"D  " < 2!!" =&EF G"E26  1 1//,   > 4"  3   ""  # D"  " # 4< 2"!# 9 "#: H.      2!!" "  " < 2!!"  @* 0  .//; = $>7  ! "  ""  #  6"   # 2#(4"3#4"#" 8#"""# # "7  #C#""! " <2!!"4"3 4#4" 3 !#" 69 # %"#:,. $:4"!#""C##4 D  4   ""# 36!  (  4"3  3# C#" 0 #5%3 :   8"22 D"  "! #J          " I  & (       



4 2"4"!#""C### 2 !94"# 4"8"22





+*,-+.//*